7 famous movies that got tiny details absolutely perfect - what is a document camera

I have something like this, and that's that it's not just good movies.
You can't just take a good movie off the movie tree and eat it on the soft moss floor of your head, and the juice in the movie drops off your chin and pulls it together on your lap.
You must go deep into the jungle of your own mental illness to uncover the lost Mucheng --Vee.
You have to sacrifice the days, weeks, or even months of your life to work and sweat on the altar of the czar
Mark won his favor.
Into the next field, you must take a blood oath to the ancient kingdom of celleah-Lude.
You must apply the feces to your face.
Then, only in this way can you release your army to weak and unconscious innocent people, claiming that their mortal souls are your own time --slaves.
Or you can do the following, which can be said to be something more crazy.
Hobbit: The contract that Bilbo barely sees makes perfect sense we 've covered how the trilogy works harder to understand Tolkien's fictional fantasy world than New Zealand becomes a real nation
But it's impossible to bring these details into the prequel, right?
I mean, when they can, those movies won't be disturbed by the positioning scout, Peter Jackson, which is why he gave up certain shots. Right?
The whole production is as lazy as s ** t. Well, no --
As it turns out, as with the original series, it's also very careful to get the details.
For example: tattoo of Dwalin. . . . . .
Written in "real" Dwarvish (
Tolkien invented the language for his legend)
They read Baruk Hazad! Khazad ai-menu!
According to the appendix, this is a notorious Khuzdul (Dwarvish)battle cry.
So this is equivalent to tattoo "love" and "hate" on your knuckles, which--
If I know my audience-
Most of you have
Speaking of which, Bifur (
A dwarf with an axe on his head)
Due to brain damage, you can only speak in dwar (
We know that short people have a pretty deep understanding of Neurology. .
Not crazy enough?
Okay, let's talk about the contract signed by Bilbo.
No one will find out if you are so weird (
Do we have anything to say ourselves? "Ringers"? No.
Let's not do this)
It's crazy without being careful--
But no one expected this to happen because it turned out that fake contracts were actually so crazy.
Lawyer James Daily looked at the contract one by one and found it entirely reasonable, except for some minor "drafting errors.
In fact, the biggest potential flaw is that there is no provision for whether the document exists under the county law or the dwar Kingdom law, which may create a "conflict of law ".
"But it may have something to do with the fact that the contract was drafted by Thorin, not with the filmmaker's mistake.
He was so busy wandering around the world that he regained his lost kingdom that he could not review notes in contract class.
6 shadows of darkness: Johnny Depp never blinks or reflects-
It's not that he never "blinks" at ridiculous job opportunities, nor does it mean that he never "reflects" on the actor he became.
Both films are a movie about vampires, the most realistic film ever made by Johnny Depp, as every female character he meets is trying to kill him.
Even Helena Bonham Carter's Dana Sculley impression is half gone on him.
Sincere praise
Isn't that strange?
But the craziest part of the movie is not just that they give Depp supernatural sexy while making him look like 14year-
The old man who sweated from his juggalo makeup;
They are.
It doesn't mean that whenever Depp passes by the mirror, they bypass his blink and do a camera trick ---
The FX team is committed to ensuring that he is not reflected in anything, which is "rough use of our vision"
According to the VFX supervisor, the effect budget.
In addition, they have set up a specialized department of the visual effects team.
In the end, it was fully rewarded, as it was the most subtle, heartfelt and credible description of vampires ever --
I can put anything here, to be honest, and you'll believe it, right?
Nobody watched the film except me.
But now, because someone has "digital Depp-
"Blink off makeup" on his resume ".
This is a great legacy.
The actor was locked indoors as a submarine war movie and I know what you're thinking: "Wow!
Sounds like an explosion!
"Man, put your horse there.
It's not one of those fun adventure war movies.
This is a frustrating war movie that ignores all the excitement and boring fun of war, but instead chooses to focus on "losing innocence" and "human costs" or whatever. You know. Oscar bait.
The film begins with a group of idealistic young sailors who will be heroes of World War II, ending with a group of broken people coming home and wondering what they have lost.
When director Wolfgang Peterson decides that he wants to explore the depth of human suffering and the darkness of the human soul, or whatever, God, Wolfgang, cheer up and he decides, rather than simply believing that his actors have the ability to express human suffering, he will make it easier for them by shooting underwater parts.
In a year.
The idea is to make sure that the paleness of their skin and the feeling of extreme despair in their eyes reflect what a real submarine crew will experience, but the craziest part of this is not what Peterson did. -
In any of the videos I found, no one seems to realize how crazy this is.
Petersen just casually mentioned that his actor was not allowed to see the sun, and that usually this casual attitude was left to pick between eating, drinking and playing and M & M.
For perspective. Real-
The killer can play freely for at least an hour in the cool breeze every day.
Not the cast.
But I'm not accusing this guy because the movie's awesome and human life is only worth so much, you know?
Maybe if Wolfgang had a similar rule, we would have more classic movies.
My Cousin Vinny: this is one of the most accurate Court movies we mentioned before and it's easy to understand why.
Most lawyers are paperwork and crazy jargon, even though we all know they're just making up the facts (seriously. We all know.
Give up this behavior and no longer embarrass yourself).
But there is a movie that solves the legal problem almost completely and accurately, which is not what you expect.
Unless you read the title of this entry, you already know in this case.
When I say "accurate", I'm not just talking about small details in the program (
Those are pretty though-point)
What I'm talking about is the fact that the film contains some, so many facts.
Smith Lane (
Prosecution of lawyers)
Described the crime in his opening remarks, he "changed his rhythm and his way of Modulation", he insisted on "specific terms" and never used the name of the defendant ---
All great prosecution skills
Later, Vinny showed his cross.
Pick out Mr.
Crane's view on crime-
He mentioned every obstacle he thought at a time, lingering in detail.
In fact, except for a small problem (
Pesci cannot represent the two defendants, but it is excusable as a technique of storytelling)
The biggest problem with the film is when prosecutors disclose evidence to Vinny. -
Not because the law does not work like this, but because. One error (
The surprising expert witness testimony of Marissa Tomay is unlikely to be adopted in 1992)
It turned out to be prescient: A year after the film was released, the Supreme Court changed the rules on how expert witnesses were admitted, tracing it back to close-perfect.
His script was fantastic, so in court he could have gotten rid of the mess of nonsense as he wanted, but it made the trial proceedings so good, so much so that a legal blog network began in 2012.
So the next time a lazy screenwriter tries to spice up his lawyer's film with Jack Nicholson screaming at a can of crime --
On-site semen, just remember: it is possible to do better.
3 Lego Movie: accurate to the toy, accurate to the wear and tear we are dealing;
Who would have thought it would work?
What I'm trying to say is that when I was 13 years old, what I had the most fun with Lego was picking them from my vacuum cleaner, but the reality is, I used to spend 45 minutes in the Lego store staring at a Lego Death Star and saying to myself, "one day ".
I bought a car in the end, but, hey, it's hard.
Also, the film was more or less kicked in the ass-
At least part of the reason is the details.
It turns out that everything in the movie can not only be re-done
With real Lego (
If you're willing to spend more than $5,000 or if you're smart ,)
But these Lego toys are carefully made.
Create a good lookloved toys.
Even if the film is digital, every piece is used.
Charlie Day's 1980 astronaut role is most obvious, and he looks exactly the same as every 1980 Lego astronaut anyone has.
Remember when I said the movie was CGI?
Not exactly correct: Not only did they use the real Lego background in many scenes, but they also scanned the actual Lego work as a model to recreate itcreate stop-
Exercise as closely as possible.
Then they actually use stop-motion.
Master and Commander: in due time, everything was a forgotten 2000 s Russell Crowe film about a British ship being chased by French ships in battle for anything.
Maybe the crown.
Look, the plot here is not important. -
What is important is clothing and hair type.
Look, fools: the sailors in this film wear wool hats, because wool is the absolute best thing to wear a sailing boat at that time, because it absorbs water, then bring it close to your body, where it will become warm and protect you from the wind-you don't care. Fine.
But wool hats are handmade.
Sewn by Welsh women!
Wait, I'm wrong: Her family has been knitting them since they were in their 1700 s.
It makes more sense.
The rest of the clothing was designed according to the work of the sailor and then artificially aged.
The scar of Jack Aubrie, after careful study, reflected the actual injury of the captain at that time.
According to a episode of the Smithsonian Channel (
By the way, Smithsonian?
Don't call props for historical accuracy of your series of movies)
The surgery in the movie is all.
Appropriate, completely accurate-
They're on the 19 th-century-
Surgeon, how does he train actors, say, to open a person's skull the way they actually operate.
Then there is makeup, which is also carefully made.
By the end of production, they have glued more than 400 pounds of their hair to the actor's head and face.
Probably not all at once.
1 End of the world: Cornetto TrilogyWith (
Mentioned earlier)
The third one is behind (and final)
A chapter in the trilogy: each of these films has a different Cornetto style, telling different parts of growth.
It's about the pressure of finding a job and settling down (
"I want to do something new and I want you to do it too! ");
Don't take your work too seriously.
"You don't know how to close it! ");
About to agree with your age and world status (
More in a second).
But it doesn't make sense until all these movies are trilogy. Let's back up.
All three films are heavily paved: Nick's drink is used to tell the whole story, and the third act is only the second act, only this time.
At the beginning, we got Gary King's memory montage of the Golden Mile, where we saw that the young version of the character in the film was taking risks.
At first, the foreshadowing was quite blatant: some of the shots were re-
Created almost perfectly behind the movie: of course, the name of the bar heralds what happens to them: "Hands Crossed" is where they fight, the famous c ** k is where Gary King is still banned (
Because what a famous c * k he is)and .
So far, that's exactly what you expect from Edgar Wright. -
But the difference here is that as the introduction of the montage continues, the foreshadowing begins to become a bit vague.
First of all, it's a lie about who started the big fight in the crosshand: In the foreshadowing someone accidentally spilled the drink on Andy, but in the real movie, andy lost his s ** t and knocked Martin Freeman's head off with a bar stool.
Then, of course, the foreshadowing is over before Gary reaches the end of the world ---
Because he didn't learn that night.
Basically, the foreshadowing becomes more vague as the character becomes drunk.
At the end of the story, "foreshadowing "(or memory)
A complete blank was drawn. "But wait!
There are protagonists (Simon Pegg)
In these three films, the lesson of the story was not learned at all: in lazy Sean, he insisted on spending his life in the bar, the end of the story convinced his girlfriend to adopt his lazy lifestyle with him. -
Despite his stupid plan to kill all their friends.
Nicholas Angel is stubborn. the-
Book police who refuse the popular cultural image of police work (
"No, I have never fired a gun in the air, and I have not 'Ah, Ah '").
But after beating this image
Obsessed with the murder of the secret community of all the people in Sandford town, he became a response to "some hippies --
"They fiddled with the recycling box in the supermarket," threw his siren and stepped on the accelerator.
Of course, he may not be as evil as the light.
But I'm sure, as a hippie, I don't want to be like that. types.
Finally, let the idea come to a logical conclusion: Gary King refuses to accept the decorations of adult life so stubbornly that, as we know, he does bring the end of adult life.
The consequences of each film are steadily rising until the iraccountable lazy idealism of every story center really ends the world.
Now you have a moral code.