On Sunday, the Israeli cabinet held an important meeting every week.
Not important. -key.
USI Kuperwasser, director general
The minister of strategic affairs, who found the time to attend the meeting, even brought a report.
Not just a demo-an audio-
Visual presentation of images and sounds.
For the first time in history, Arabic songs were played at cabinet meetings due to speeches.
Minister of Strategic Affairs, who introduced the director-
The general of the ministers stressed that he was not just one of the thousands of Kupperwassers who lived among us.
He's a brigadier.
General Kuperwasser, the undisputed military authority.
The theme is.
Kuperwasser told the ministers what terrible words our Palestinian neighbors have said to us.
He picked the toughest statements for them.
These are, in fact, harsh statements.
Some of them were influenced by foolish racism, some deliberately misrepresented history, and all of them had deep hatred for the state of Israel.
There is no way to defend these statements and there is no reason to defend them morally.
Incitement is one of the ugliest aspects of the conflict.
But a wise, mature Israeli government should know how to review the issue of incitement in the right context.
In the first phase, it will investigate the incitement of the Arab world to us.
If not, it will find that hatred of Israel is a fact of life in the entire Arab world and in most parts of the Muslim world.
A copy of the etiquette of the Elders of Zion so that the country for sale is not Palestine, but Palestine.
There is no border for incitement to Israel.
Not Egypt, but Egypt.
Hatred is the exhaust pipe for the regime to vent its discontent.
There is an absolute resistance of the public around all classes to Israel.
The Israeli government, including the current one, is ignoring this inconvenience.
Ignore it correctly.
This sentence is too outrageous, but action is more important.
Compared to returning to war, we live better in a peace full of hatred.
In the second phase, the Cabinet will meet once a week to review the state of incitement here.
Instead of complaining that the PA had compared Jews to dogs, it would ask how a senior minister of the PA was doing.
It could have had a thorough discussion on this issue: What is more superficial, what is more mean, dog or ass, how the two are perceived in the Palestinian tradition, how is perceived in Jewish tradition.
Later, the government will discuss the rabbi's sermon.
Who is the greater racist, Mufti of Jerusalem;
More violently, the sermon at the Hebron mosque or the leaflets distributed by the Jerusalem synagogue;
Who is more dangerous, who throws stones in haevara, who is young in Izhar.
"But there," one Minister would say, "incitement was broadcast on television channels . ".
"Where on earth does it air?
Another minister will ask.
"But the map," the first long will say . ".
"The State of Israel is not mentioned on their map.
In their map, Palestine extends from the sea to the Jordan River.
The second minister would say "true ".
"Honourable Ministers, I invite you to look at the map of our school.
From the sea to the Jordan River, we also have a state, not a state.
The difference is only on the name.
"The more sensible and sincere Jews have said to this: one needs to know one.
A pious hypocrite.
People who live in glass houses should not throw stones.
To shock ministers who don't understand the purpose of the Sunday meeting, what the cabinet needs to decide and what to do, Cooper VASER told them a story.
When he met an Arab abroad, one thing happened to him. Yes, an Arab.
When he told him that he was an Israeli, the Arabs said, "it is hard to believe that you have no horns.
"This is a cabinet meeting," commented Minister Amir Peretz . ".
"This is not the place to share personal experiences.
"If Peretz looked closely at the government's table, he would realize that he was wrong: it was not a personal experience, it was a deep understanding.
His colleagues, ministers, are a good example.
There was something in their heads.
If it's not an extra brain, it must be a corner. P. S.
Minister Stanitz, who initiated Sunday's discussion, was indeed the victim of incitement.
The man who incited him was very vicious, and his successor was the Minister of Finance.
Lapid's term began at the stadium.
Blake described the economic situation at the end of the Steinitz era. ;
Economic damage;
The numbers turned out to be wrong, but he did not apologize.
This incitement should be the subject of a cabinet meeting.
A report against such incitement should be prepared.
Where is Kuperwasser when you need it?