From the beginning, revealing the smug Orwell-style "Integrity Initiative" is like a post-
Assange spy thriller
The first internal files were uploaded to a niche anonymous server in November 5.
There, it has been widely ignored for two weeks in an ungovernment blockbuster, and has issued an arrogant threat to reshape the world from behind the monitor.
But the leak is substantial. once it is made public and spread through Twitter, then Russian media, and then other media channels, it will break out.
Internal documents refer to the establishment of a "network" to counter the "malicious" influence of Russia.
Application for funding from the British Department of Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (FCO)
Committed to building a dozen undercover "clusters" of "competent, loyal and good"
From Canada to Germany to Georgia, it is better to have a suitable Institute affiliate that will be deployed in a specific counterRussian "goals.
"Planned" to inform Russian citizens, strengthen the democratic opposition, "explore the transmission of information through television and radio and entertainment", while also providing courses for bankers, students, and most shocking, british primary school students are also threatened by the Kremlin.
Hundreds of respected public figures are listed in categories such as "US cluster", "UK core" and "UK journalists", including The Washington Post contributor and the London School of Economics academic
Other registers include private emails from British embassy officials around the world, among which the foreign ministries and defense ministries of several NATO allies are also involved.
In the foreign ministry application, other funders included the US State Department, NATO headquarters and Facebook, who contributed "£ 100,000" to research and education activities ".
"While the text attached to the file dump is considered anonymous, a loose collective twitter account denies any part.
Is the file leaked or hacked (
If it is the latter, has anyone given it to the leader)
The British authorities have not tried to deny its authenticity.
Soon, online investigators matched the Integrity Initiative with its parent company, the Institute of stateroom, a charity registered in 2015 with a legal address
Its board identified key names with military intelligence experience, as well as a range of complex corporate structures that can be traced back to FCO and MI6 and GCHQ, both companies
So the Integrity Initiative is real, but how does its plan come about? In the file submitted by FCO, it debriefed the successful "moncloa movement", which
At noon on June 7, 2018, the Spanish cluster "heard" of Pedro Banos, allegedly "pro-Spain.
The voice of the Kremlin will be appointed a key position in the national security sector.
Within 2 hours, the cluster will "activate the network" and make an appointment.
Media editorials emerged, leading political parties were reminded that dozens of tweets were made in credible voices.
At eight o'clock P. M. the same day, the reputation of Banos, a senior military official with decades of experience, had been destroyed and was later rejected for appointment.
The whole action constitutes a series of moral violations: From the unannounced interests of the colluded participants appearing as innocent journalists and scholars in the media, to the smearing of public figures, foreign interference in sovereign state affairs.
This is the military intelligence that uses public tools to deceive the broad masses of people-not just the actions of a deep state, but also the actions of a foreign country, closer to what is called Black Psychology in military terms.
From an external point of view, it is difficult to judge how representative the status and success of the movement are for the work of the Integrity Initiative, but it is evident from all the documents that its scope is wide, from the fight against the spread of the Russian Orthodox Church in Greece, to the restriction of Pro
Moscow made a voice on Serbian television suggesting the launch of "independent [sic]
After local media were deemed too skeptical about the White House, Italy launched an open information campaign after the Skripals case.
There is no task that is too small: on March 2016, an internal document showed that the organization forwarded multiple complaints to the media regulator OFCOM through RT in order to prompt an investigation into the channel, this is a prominent nemesis in the internal integrity initiative document.
This may seem like a small act of reassurance, but it is again proof of the British army's practice: a military intelligence organization posing as a legitimate public grievance.
As geopolitical tensions continue to escalate, it is no surprise that Britain has decided to invest in such a tool.
The government protects national interests, and all major powers have a range of tools to exercise soft power, which is almost dereliction of duty if London does not.
The integrity initiative does not have anything revolutionary at work.
As part of its proactive policy, the Soviet Union has cultivated influential sympathetic figures in the West, while the CIA has for decades
The long "Robin action" was able to release any story it wanted in the name of America's most respected journalist with dozens of leading US media outlets.
In this information war, it was easy to agree with the Times columnist Edward Lucas that when he called the group "small and poor," he did not try to deny that he had
"FCO said it had given 2.
In the past two years, the National School of Management has received a grant of £ 2 million, which is only a small portion of £ 70 million --
It allocated an annual budget for its vague Russian language program.
For the same purpose, there are billions available elsewhere, not necessarily traceable, with thousands of non-levers
The British government has monetary power, with dozens of super-national alliances between the army, intelligence agencies, diplomats and politicians.
The integrity initiative is just the tip of the iceberg, probably not the most uneven.
However, despite its limited scope, it violates the norms of civil societyraising.
Just like the silence of the media.
A few weeks after the leak, mainstream British media simply ignored it, although editors must have seen it on social media, RT or Sputnik.
When the story was brought up, it was just about using the official Twitter account of the Integrity Initiative to forward negative messages about Labor leader Jeremy Corbyn.
After the Ministry of Foreign Affairs was forced to reply, it claimed that the Institute of state administration strategy was "independent of the government . "
"Its statement was reprinted by all major British media in the news cable format without any questioning or sarcastic expressions.
Six weeks after the initial upload, despite questions raised by Parliament, none of the major media on both sides of the Atlantic bothered to authenticate or classify the leak and publish the findings.
Even as mentioned above, summaries of these files cannot be read in any popular English --
Language newspapers.
It was the media that fearlessly investigated Russian intervention before the Brexit referendum, revealing that Moscow spent 73 p on Facebook to change the vote.
This is an actual government document claiming that social networks are funding the psyops organization.
Outline specific plans for propaganda operations on Russian territory.
Carole Cadwalladr of The Guardian, who, by the way, is listed as a spokesperson for the integrity initiative campaign, unwearily digs into the personal history of Arron Banks 'suspicious Russian wives, of course, she can take a day to browse some PDF files.
Perhaps Twitter, which bans so-called foreign-influenced accounts, can look at the Integrity Initiative, which continues to spread information without restrictions.
Moscow is said to be in swing elections, starting protests, triggering a revolution with some troll accounts, some targeted advertising and some meetings, usually, A lot of indirect evidence or crazy speculation is intertwined to make the story come true. Here are black-on-
White claimed that a foreign official was vandalized and was prevented from holding their posts.
Will democracy not die in daknesper? Maybe it's not anti-democracy.
The Russians, or by inference
Maybe this is the case, but the media should admit that they are not brave truths --
Teller, but only a vendor on the agenda.
Or do they think the story is not interesting enough? Our audience indicators show the opposite.
It was sudden-
If they are loyal to their country, then do not claim to have free media and acknowledge that newspapers and the BBC serve the Queen only, not the reader.
Maybe they are just right about the West, Russia is the villain so complacent that they don't even see any inconsistency.
One standard for our friends, another standard for our enemies.
Journalists in Europe and the United States often see the Russian media landscape as a puppet show, but there are also media reports that have been exposed and even talk about inconvenient allegations such as troll farms or Skripals.
Like an order, the subject will not be quiet.
Here, it is surprising that the single nature of mainstream Western universities-there is no voice of opposition at all.
They can't all be part of the "core" of the Integrity Initiative cluster, can they do that? This is a challenge: the next time western media reporters sit down and magic exists, there is another evidence --
Free article on how the Kremlin has sparked a yellow vest protest in France, why not write a simple and true summary of the Integrity Initiative incident?
Share this story with friends!