laser disc evidence display system also on trial in suit : courts: the innovative device that allows lawyers instant retrieval of materials has proven a time-saver elsewhere, but its use raises complex legal questions. - overhead document projector

When jurors hear civil proceedings involving the Upper Deck Company--
The company is a revolutionary baseball card four.
Color holographic images jumping off the cardboard-
They may benefit from the latest legal technology.
Ironically, the innovative court display system-
Consists of a bar code scanning stick, three laser disc players operating at the same time, and four TV screens-
Will be used against Carlsbad-
In the case to be heard by the Orange County High Court.
Anthony J. 's lawyer uses the laser disc systemPassante Jr. and Andrew J.
Prendiville, who claims a 3% dispute over the upper layer, said they would be able to bring up thousands of images in an instant: Documents, charts, photos, yes, and baseball cards.
Instead of dealing with poster boards, transcripts, charts, slides and projectors, and snapshots.
Brant Noziska, a San Diego lawyer representing two plaintiffs, said in an interview that he would rely on a single integrated system to illustrate his evidence.
The cutting-edge laser disc system is expected to significantly shorten the time for complex trials, making it more attractive to jurors. But it also raises the issue of fairness, because lawyers facing the system may be technically at a very disadvantage.
Noziska said: "You can bounce back on the disc without having to wade through the files and charts
Leaf Notebook, dim the lights or slide.
"It allows you to control what the jury is looking.
"But normally, at trial, any exhibits displayed by One Direction to the jurors must be provided to the other party.
However, opposition lawyer John A said that once the image disappears from the screen.
Barclay, unless the judge hearing the case ordered Noziska to provide it to the other party, it would be useless for the opposition.
"There is no law in this regard," Barclay said . ".
"What is fair competition in the conduct of a fair trial?
"In addition to the upper tiers, the defendants in the proceedings include Richard P. , president of the company ·McWilliam--
A graduate of Anaheim Service High School, who gave up his accounting career, joined the then-based young baseball card company in Yorba Linda. -
And Boris Cober, another investor.
McWilliam denied that Passante and Prendiville were his friends at Servite, both of whom were interested in the private holding company.
Barclay, on behalf of Korbel, will not say whether he will try to use the system for his customers or whether he will question Noziska's use of the system.
If he does, the judge should rule on the issue of fairness before the testimony begins.
A similar version of the laser disc system developed by Santa Ana Cardomon Group is being used by the defendant in the product safety lawsuit tried here.
In that case, Judge Byron K.
Macmillan ruled that counsel could not use it when making an opening statement to the jury, but could use it during the trial as evidence for the introduction of evidence and the conclusion of the debate. William B.
Stremel, the plaintiff's lawyer who did not use the system, said he was "not quite sure how effective the system was ".
A number of companies across the country have developed versions of the laser disc system, which is the first major showcase in a lengthy and complex case of construction defects in San Diego tried by Noziska.
That version is made up of a high
Tech, creative laser concept, in the case of William Kennedy Smith rape in Florida, the inventor looked at the lawyer fumbling for the exhibits.
They used the 19 th. and 20th-
In the 21 st century of technology in rape trials, the adaptation of barcode and laser technology allowed lawyers to hire 21-
"Century technology," Noziska said.
In the San Diego case, the jury returned three days later for $6. 75-
Million judgment from Noziska client
He said that when he spoke to jurors after the verdict, they told him, "They were all impressed with the technology, but they were not in awe about it.
While the system can save time--
According to Noziska estimates, about 10% to 15%-
It does not save money compared to the manual exhibition and in fact increases the cost of preparation.
He said that for complex cases involving thousands of exhibits, "there is a huge price to pay in any case," adding that due to the higher frequency of use of the laser system, he expects the cost of the laser system to drop. William P.
Volk, representing the accused in the San Diego case, was a conversion to the system, calling it a "wave of the future ". . . .
This makes it easy for the jury to understand these issues.
Volk believes that the system shortens the time of two trials
Thirds pointed out that several judges and lawyers had a look at it by the way, or operated in person during the break.
Volk said his only criticism was that the system made Noziska "overemphasize what I don't think is the problem
Problems that are amplified and enhanced.
Because they appear on the TV screen, they attract their attention.
Because of the way it is presented, it looks like it has a lot of weight. . . .
Video technology caught the attention of the jury.
"There was also a problem of fairness at the trial in San Diego.
High Court judge Kevin W.
The Midlam command Noziska allows Volk to bring up some images from Noziska's disc, and even allows Volk to code some of its exhibits to the system.
By the end of the case, Midlam was impressed by the fact that the system had reduced trial time by at least seven days.
In an interview, he said that if it is used by both parties in the same complex trial,
It can save thirty times the trial time.
Normally, when a lawyer in a complex civil case appears in court with 20 or 30 loose Persons
Midlam said, "the poor jurors are sweating cold.
"Some of the 1,400 documents have been in the past 20 years, but they have been enhanced on the disc and the relevant paragraphs are highlighted in bold. James R.
The assistant presiding judge of the San Diego County High Court, mileken, said the system effectively combines supermarket and CD-ROM technology.
Milliken agreed with Midlam that it was separated from the recorded testimony and called in cross-examination
The examination of witnesses was particularly effective in the impeachment testimony of jurors, providing not only conflicting statements, but also nuances and body language.
"It's better to stand there and read a cold transcript than to stand there," Midlam said . ".
When lawyers using the system are properly prepared and organized, "trial is like a dream," Milliken said, which may shorten the trial time by 20%.
The judge said that even before the jury was selected, the issue of evidence could be decided in advance, or that in the course of the trial, the delay was much less.
Barclay, who is likely to face the laser disc system soon, has no risk.
Last week, he presided over a panel discussion on the system, where the Cardomon Group presented a presentation in front of lawyers and judges belonging to the Inns of Court local branch of the National Bar organization.