We are not quite sure what the public thinks about our journalism.
Years ago, in a public opinion poll, the American public's view of its journalism was tested, and the survey evaluated the relative credibility of some professions with the public, this makes reporters do better than the second time.
Car salesman.
We can believe that this is an insult to public opinion.
Since then, the fate of the American news media has plummeted, and this view is likely to get worse.
There is no reason to believe that our news media will be better if we conduct similar objective investigations here.
Because the pranks of our newsmen can hardly inspire the trust and confidence of the tribe: paid news in all forms of expression;
Wheeler's reporter
Dealers Exposed in Radia tapes;
A business organization revealed in the reverse tingling action that the reporter was the threatening person of the company;
Unlike their corrupt political or commercial quarries, journalists who are being interviewed are getting away with punishment for a false, thick sense of omerta code --as-
Professional loyalty of thieves;
Journalists who please politicians and cut them down on the power ladder;
Those journalists who have angered the mob, after they have done so, like Mark Anthony in Caesar, sit down and enjoy the prospect of their release --
"You're playing a prank, you're going the way you want to go!
"So, there are enough people who are desperate about the way journalism develops.
This is not to dismiss or detract from the solid work done by those who are committed to the cause and mission of journalism to promote the public interest.
Journalism deserves serious residual respect, and for the next sensational, these gatekeepers who stick to the best practices of the industry are still enjoying it.
But it doesn't matter how doors and walls are made by technology, which spreads news to both formal and social media.
Now, it has changed from an agenda-building body to a constantly updated social structure. Tech-savvy and tech-
The free and ubiquitous led digital journalism, as well as the restructuring or re-ordering of any new hierarchy, is becoming the reason why the Brotherhood is becoming increasingly desperate.
In a small, post-modern, almost closedoff-
"Academic research", "Hedger, Harth and mobile phone", "the turn of the century", "George Myerson (
That's what he said, his fame.
Using the idea of "mobilization" to redefine the social order of communication.
He is using the word to suggest how mobile phones are combined with modern society, how to promote the business of modern society, and give new status to modern society.
It has been about 16 years since then, and we now know that mass communication at the consumer level, including news, is all about delivering information on handheld smartphones.
Such mobilization may not be in the interest of expanding or enriching the public domain, said Mr Myerson.
Myerson draws on habermas's later elaboration and construction in the public domain, in which he distinguishes between "the world of life" and "the system ".
He believes that his public domain belongs to the world of life, not part of the system. he refers to the National machine and market economy.
In addition, he believes that the work of a democratic society is to "build a democratic dam to prevent the colonial erosion of systemic needs in the field of the world of life ".
In this plan, the mobile phone has become so popular and critical for Myerson that it has become systematic.
In the world of life, so in the public domain, what should have been a means of democracy has become a tool for this system.
Melson wrote, "Mobile devices will be the highest medium to turn everything into a system, driving the process of understanding, replacing meaning with information, and reaching a consensus on the insight of instructions and information.
The world of life will be put aside in the process.
We will be left in a shared system network for work and consumption, learning and being together.
Finally, there will be a "technology" in the world of life ".
"This technology of the world of life is not only in terms of the delivery and distribution model of news, but also in terms of the form of expression.
Twitter-mobile news
Push news, blogs and Facebook
After the news industry put forward requirements for News language.
New era journalists deploy sparse and reduced language requirements that match mobile devices or small screens or are suitable for mobile devices or small screen reception, it is the multimedia application of the basic digital news for the different requirements of innovation and differential language.
The language is mixed and matched, chopped and cut, simplified as a symbol of the emoji, extended to the lead vertical through immersive simulations.
Written and spoken language, body language, symbolic language, emotional language, found a strange equivalence in this techniquemediated realm.
This is not a mixed language.
This is a miscellaneous language.
The transformation of language is not as clear and unique as the writing form suitable for printed news and the speaking form suitable for broadcasting.
There, one can work the difference between textual and verbal.
Conversational style in simple language, use words with fewer syllables as much as possible instead of more (
The speed and reading length of TV or radio news items is best measured in syllables per minute instead of words per minute in print)
No more than one idea is conveyed in each sentence so that it can be easily registered in the mind of the audience/audience (
Remember, the explanation is that the audience of a news show has only one chance, unlike the reader of a printed publication, and if he does not understand, he can return to it again and again)
. . . . . . These and some other details distinguish between print and broadcast news.
Journalism is already a language of distance from literature.
Creative literary writing violates the essence of core news and is suspected of its creativity, which means that it is free of facts;
On the surface, journalism is about factual writing.
The patronizing of this language practice or discipline by Litterateurs is understandable, and such practice or discipline is seen on a daily level as a hacker and a pedestrian, ridiculed as a "journalist ".
But, of course, there is great news writing itself, as well as a streamlined, streamlined style that often implies a clear tone and an urgent tone that feeds back into traditional literature, let it power up and change it, just like Hemingway and Marquez are different.
Both of them turned the empirical language of news into a remarkable literature: Ernst Hemingway, through modest control of imagination and perfect expression of the economy, gabriel Garcia Marquez changes by freely dominating the mind, as in alchemy, the characters, the circumstances and events that enter the zany field are not so much fictional as super real, moments are considered magical realism.
The recently published literary supplement of The Times reprinted a V. S.
In the Bible, published in the 1960 s, the author talks about the tension between his language as a Trinidad man and the literature he touches and absorbs, although he started writing seriously at the age of 18, how does this prevent him from actually writing for five years.
As he explained the dilemma, "The language is ours and can be used as we wish.
Therefore, the literature that comes with it has special authority;
This literature is like an alien myth.
For example, the infamous poem of Watson about daffodils.
There is no doubt that it is a beautiful flower;
But we never met.
Open a book to make an instant adjustment.
I need to be able to adapt.
I rejected all Dickens' descriptions of London;
Though I might keep him.
Micawber and other people wearing the clothes that the illustrator gave them, I gave them the faces and sounds of the people I knew and placed them on buildings and streets I knew
The process of adaptation is automatic and continuous.
I turned into a tropical downpour;
Snow and fog I accept are the usual practice of books. Anything—
Like an illustration.
This made me embarrassed because I proved how strange my own entertainment was, anything that tried to remove the character from makeup
In the world where I set them up, I refused.
At the end of the article, népaul talks about the more comprehensive scope and importance of language that has nothing to do with literature or is not inspired by literature.
In this case, it is the language of the smell (
Just as immersed in the digital multimedia narrative).
One night, he sat on the balcony of an Indian family in British Guyana, and the smell of a flower familiar with his childhood floated by his side, but he could not give it a name
His master told him it was Jasmine. “Jasmine!
Népaul was full of praise for the discovery, "so I 've known it all these years!
For me, this is a word in a book, a word to play with, something to remove from the dull vegetation I know . . . . . . .
I stuck it in the top buckle eye of the shirt I opened.
I smelled it when I walked back to the hotel.
Jasmine, Jasmine
But the word has been separated from what has been spent in my mind for too long.
They did not come together
"In digital multimedia retelling, the word comes together with flowers, its smells, its look and feel.
It is at the technological frontier of journalism that this excavation of language ability, as we have learned from the linguistic theories of nom chumski and others, is happening genetically, in this way, it goes beyond the forms and expressions we are accustomed to, and therefore, it goes beyond the conditions of our known literature.
Whether this news language will in turn redefine and rewrite literature is an idea that we may turn --
Maybe even with some reasonable despair.